One liberal said that allowing poor people to prevent childbirth (i.e. free abortions) is a good moral choice because those people cannot afford to have a child.Most reports I see say this election was decided because of moral values and that has many on the liberal side trying to justify many of their positions as moral positions. One liberal said that allowing poor people to prevent childbirth (i.e. free abortions) is a good moral choice because those people cannot afford to have a child. Taking the life of an innocent child to save a few bucks is not a good moral choice. Others say that providing healthcare to those who do not have it is a good moral choice. I agree that helping those in need is indeed a good moral choice – but is it the government’s responsibility? Liberals will argue against legislating morality but isn’t that what government funded healthcare is? Taking care of the poor and needy is really the responsibility of the church – not the government. Most of those who are in favor of government funded healthcare are also in favor of abortion. How can those people say they are taking the moral high road when they are for killing innocent children?
Moral values must be in agreement with what God says.Moral values start with the utmost respect of life. Moral values must be in agreement with what God says. God is against hands that shed innocent blood. God is against the perversion of homosexuality. God is against adultery. God is against selling out for the sake of the pocketbook.